Pilot project: Western Mediterranean

The pilot project in the Western Mediterranean is being implemented in Algeria, France, Italy, Malta, Morocco, Spain and Tunisia, while other member countries of the Union for the Mediterranean in the Western Mediterranean can also participate in training activities.

Building on previous experiences in the region to promote good MSP practices, activities are adapted to meet both regional and national priorities and needs in the context of the Western Mediterranean. More specifically, they are designed in accordance with goal 3 of the “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions” on the Initiative for the sustainable development of the blue economy in the western Mediterranean (COM(2017)183), which aims at a better governance of the region.

Main objectives

> Increase cooperation between EU and non-EU Member States

> Formulate regional recommendations in line with the WestMED Initiative and support the adoption of a roadmap

> Strengthen institutional capacities

Desired outcome

> Roadmap for transboundary MSP and Sustainable Blue Economy in the Western Mediterranean

Technical reports

With the aim to assist its beneficiary countries in developing approaches, tools and actions at regional level to contribute to a coherent ecosystem-based MSP process, MSPglobal has launched two technical reports on current and potential future conditions in the area covered by its pilot project in the Western Mediterranean.

Technical Report on Current Conditions and Compatibility of Maritime Uses in the Western Mediterranean

EN | FR
(IOC Technical Series, 160, 2021)

Technical Report on Future Conditions and Scenarios for MSP and Sustainable Blue Economy Opportunities in the Western Mediterranean

EN | FR
(IOC Technical Series, 162, 2021)

Storytelling tool

Based on the spatial analysis of existing conditions and the identification of possible alternative outcomes (scenarios) within the Western Mediterranean, MSPglobal has developed a multilingual storytelling tool for the pilot project area. The objective is to present the data and information in a simplified and interactive way, and as such to turn complex concepts into notions easily understood by a wide audience.

It is an additional product to support the pre-planning phase of a transboundary MSP between EU and non-EU countries and raise awareness about the need for dialogue and cooperation for the development of a Sustainable Blue Economy in the region.

To access the storytelling tool, please click on the image below.

Western Mediterranean Roadmap on Marine Spatial Planning and Sustainable Blue Economy

Building on capacity development activities to foster knowledge exchange and dialogue, the MSPglobal Initiative guided its beneficiary countries towards the formulation of transboundary recommendations on MSP and Sustainable Blue Economy in the Western Mediterranean.

I. Inter-institutional and cross-border cooperation
This refers to the interrelation and articulation between the different institutional, public policy and administration levels from the local to the national, as well as between neighbouring countries.
Promote an integrated and multi-scale approach to governance: within countries, coordination is needed within and across layers of governments (from national to local scale) and planning should take into account local variations. At regional scale, supranational engagement mechanisms are required; these should be facilitated by recognised regional platforms (i.e., existing international/regional conventions). In compliance with national laws, provisions of UNCLOS, as well as relevant multi/bilateral agreements in place, transboundary MSP approaches should promote the principle of the Mediterranean as “Common Sea”, including the concept of “Common Goods”, through the shared and coordinated management of areas under one’s own jurisdiction and of resources that have no borders. Establish collaborative mechanisms through consultation and information sharing across institutions with maritime competence with a view to integrating MSP into public policies that have an impact on the use and management of national maritime space.
II. Blue economy
*Sustainable and strategic development of maritime sectors in the context of planning.*
The definition of national blue economy strategies is essential in order to align MSP objectives and processes with the blue growth interests of the country (i.e., what sectors is MSP intended to promote) thus, establishing a clear path for collaboration in both aspects (blue economy and MSP) at the national and supranational level. The contribution of MSP to achieving socio-economic and ecological objectives should be reflected in these blue economy strategies. Introduce an environmental goods and services component in all projects planned in the maritime space and engage all key actors in the maritime and coastal space in the MSP processes along the entire value chain (planning, design, implementation, arbitration and evaluation). MSP can promote sustainable blue economy strategies by allocating space to a specific sector (e.g., renewable energy) for economic development, guided by the concept of good environmental status, environmental impact assessments, and inclusive consultation and acceptability (both administration and stakeholders).
III. Ecosystem approach
*Planning from an ecosystem perspective to ensure ecosystem coherence, taking into account the possible effects of the distribution of maritime uses in the coastal and marine environment.*
At the national level, initially, the ecosystem approach should be embedded in the legal framework of MSP, so the objectives of the ecosystem approach are legally recognised. Thereafter, guidelines are needed to operationalise the ecosystem approach within the national maritime space in order to protect marine ecosystem goods and services. MSP plans should be aligned with the overall objectives and processes for environmental protection at the national and international level, in particular in the EU and Mediterranean context (i.e., MSFD and ecosystem approach) and including policies devoted to specific sectors (e.g. GFCM, MEDPOL, etc.). For this purpose, develop and apply at the national and (sub) regional level mechanisms and tools to ensure that a reasonable consistency is achieved. Promote increased knowledge (inventories) on species, habitats and their interaction as well as on the consequences of cumulative impacts on the marine environment.
IV. Research, development, innovation and training
*Knowledge, techniques, data and products to support the development of marine spatial plans and the strengthening of stakeholders’ capacities during the process.*
Countries should continue promoting and financing data collection and sharing, which, in addition to guiding decision-making for the design of plans, will be needed to evaluate and inform the plans’ further improvements. MSP transboundary projects and international initiatives – whose outputs should be directly applicable by competent authorities in the countries – can play a catalytic role in generating knowledge through research. Encourage research, innovation and capacity development in the marine and maritime domains, particularly regional knowledge on cumulative impacts, land-sea interactions and the effects of climate change. Promote and implement transdisciplinary approaches, integrating knowledge on social, cultural and economic processes together with ecological, biological, geological and physical processes, and frame these three recommendations in the context of the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030).
V. Participation and communication
*Dissemination of knowledge on Marine Spatial Planning and involvement of stakeholders and the public.*
The level of public participation at the regional scale should be aligned with the level of cooperation established at the technical and administrative scales. In a transboundary context, this may require specific engagement mechanisms to share know-how and expertise between countries and should be approached on a case-by-case basis. Make general information about MSP and blue economy available to the public at different stages of the process, in an understandable “language” and attractive format, ensuring a balance among the various stakeholders represented. Effort should be invested to (a) establish mechanisms to achieve active participation of users of the marine space and (b) educate them and the public about the benefits of MSP and the role of stakeholders within the MSP process through initiatives such as participatory sciences, educational marine areas, nature protection activities, etc.

I. Inter-institutional and cross-border cooperation

This refers to the interrelation and articulation between the different institutional, public policy and administration levels from the local to the national, as well as between neighbouring countries.

Promote an integrated and multi-scale approach to governance: within countries, coordination is needed within and across layers of governments (from national to local scale) and planning should take into account local variations. At regional scale, supranational engagement mechanisms are required; these should be facilitated by recognised regional platforms (i.e., existing international/regional conventions).
In compliance with national laws, provisions of UNCLOS, as well as relevant multi/bilateral agreements in place, transboundary MSP approaches should promote the principle of the Mediterranean as “Common Sea”, including the concept of “Common Goods”, through the shared and coordinated management of areas under one’s own jurisdiction and of resources that have no borders.
Establish collaborative mechanisms through consultation and information sharing across institutions with maritime competence with a view to integrating MSP into public policies that have an impact on the use and management of national maritime space.

II. Blue economy

Sustainable and strategic development of maritime sectors in the context of planning.

The definition of national blue economy strategies is essential in order to align MSP objectives and processes with the blue growth interests of the country (i.e., what sectors is MSP intended to promote) thus, establishing a clear path for collaboration in both aspects (blue economy and MSP) at the national and supranational level. The contribution of MSP to achieving socio-economic and ecological objectives should be reflected in these blue economy strategies.
Introduce an environmental goods and services component in all projects planned in the maritime space and engage all key actors in the maritime and coastal space in the MSP processes along the entire value chain (planning, design, implementation, arbitration and evaluation).
MSP can promote sustainable blue economy strategies by allocating space to a specific sector (e.g., renewable energy) for economic development, guided by the concept of good environmental status, environmental impact assessments, and inclusive consultation and acceptability (both administration and stakeholders).

III. Ecosystem approach

Planning from an ecosystem perspective to ensure ecosystem coherence, taking into account the possible effects of the distribution of maritime uses in the coastal and marine environment.

At the national level, initially, the ecosystem approach should be embedded in the legal framework of MSP, so the objectives of the ecosystem approach are legally recognised. Thereafter, guidelines are needed to operationalise the ecosystem approach within the national maritime space in order to protect marine ecosystem goods and services.
MSP plans should be aligned with the overall objectives and processes for environmental protection at the national and international level, in particular in the EU and Mediterranean context (i.e., MSFD and ecosystem approach) and including policies devoted to specific sectors (e.g. GFCM, MEDPOL, etc.). For this purpose, develop and apply at the national and (sub) regional level mechanisms and tools to ensure that a reasonable consistency is achieved.
Promote increased knowledge (inventories) on species, habitats and their interaction as well as on the consequences of cumulative impacts on the marine environment.

IV. Research, development, innovation and training

Knowledge, techniques, data and products to support the development of marine spatial plans and the strengthening of stakeholders’ capacities during the process.

Countries should continue promoting and financing data collection and sharing, which, in addition to guiding decision-making for the design of plans, will be needed to evaluate and inform the plans’ further improvements. MSP transboundary projects and international initiatives – whose outputs should be directly applicable by competent authorities in the countries – can play a catalytic role in generating knowledge through research.
Encourage research, innovation and capacity development in the marine and maritime domains, particularly regional knowledge on cumulative impacts, land-sea interactions and the effects of climate change.
Promote and implement transdisciplinary approaches, integrating knowledge on social, cultural and economic processes together with ecological, biological, geological and physical processes, and frame these three recommendations in the context of the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030).

V. Participation and communication

Dissemination of knowledge on Marine Spatial Planning and involvement of stakeholders and the public.

The level of public participation at the regional scale should be aligned with the level of cooperation established at the technical and administrative scales. In a transboundary context, this may require specific engagement mechanisms to share know-how and expertise between countries and should be approached on a case-by-case basis.
Make general information about MSP and blue economy available to the public at different stages of the process, in an understandable “language” and attractive format, ensuring a balance among the various stakeholders represented.
Effort should be invested to (a) establish mechanisms to achieve active participation of users of the marine space and (b) educate them and the public about the benefits of MSP and the role of stakeholders within the MSP process through initiatives such as participatory sciences, educational marine areas, nature protection activities, etc.